Concerns arising from White Paper proposals
THE Cattle Council of Australia commends the work of the red meat industry in developing “A Better Red Meat Future: A White Paper for the Red Meat Advisory Council”. This valuable document will help guide further discussion to deliver a better red meat industry structure for the future.
Cattle Council acknowledges it has been a lengthy and complex process to create this document and thanks the Red Meat MOU Review Taskforce for its efforts.
While appreciating the difficulty of undertaking a review of the MOU given the inherent complexity of the red meat supply chain, this acknowledgement should not be considered an endorsement of all recommendations made in the White Paper on the future structure of the red meat industry.
As Cattle Council’s response to the Green paper states: “The MOU was never intended to define what the Industry should look like”. Change should be driven by mutual consensus and evolution.
As such, Cattle Council has grave concerns regarding the proposed restructure as outlined in the Red Meat MOU Review White Paper.
The key consideration for Cattle Council, its founding State Farming Organisation members and direct producer members, is achieving the most effective representation for cattle producers while realising the best possible research, development and marketing outcomes through oversight of levies spent on their behalf.
Consequently, Cattle Council does not agree with the proposed structure of NewCo1 in its current form. The grass-fed beef sector contributes the greatest share of industry levies, and no indication is given that the proposed structure would provide any mechanism for greater effective producer oversight through their representative organisations nor clarity on how these levies would be spent.
Producers are unwilling to cede any share of industry representation, nor any say in how industry levies are spent. Specifically, there is no compelling evidence nor specific detail which outlines how the proposed NewCo1 would realise better outcomes for beef cattle producers.
As the prescribed Peak Industry Council, Cattle Council this year celebrated 40 years of service to the grassfed cattle industry. Our direct and SFO-based members who volunteer their time and resources believe Cattle Council should continue to represent and advocate the priorities of cattle producers’ interests for the next 40 years.
Cattle Council and its members recognise the need to achieve efficiencies in the current system and is open-minded regarding other reforms proposed in the White Paper. While the scope for efficiencies which could be achieved under a single red meat research body are attractive, any such consolidation would need to embrace strong producer representation and accountable levy investment, and be able to deliver on specific priorities.
There is scope for better governance and accountability of service providers, but the case is yet to be made in terms of how any restructures or mergers would achieve better outcomes for producers and other levy payers.
Cattle Council has a strong constructive working relationship with our service provider MLA and its staff. As RMAC has identified, the industry's people are a key priority for all stakeholders; another reason industry reform needs to be properly considered. The desire to retain and attract staff during this reform period, both in service provider organisations and peak councils, should be front of mind.
Cattle Council looks forward to working with other RMAC signatories to develop and refine the MOU so that it is acceptable to all levy payers and particularly our cattle producer members, who represent the majority of levy payers in the industry.
Enquires: Tom Dawkins 0409 219 527